Ananth Venkatesh
(written in August)

Kashmir of India has been under a state of belligerence over the last two months, which is heartrending. A segment of the Kashmiri remonstrators, inevitably hostile to India, has fierily invaded the lanes of pretty Kashmir, in the company of children. The national security personnel along with the provincial police have been the targets of the rage of these remonstrators. The mercilessness of these protestors is evident in their transportation of impressionable children to the Kashmiri boulevards in order to provoke the Indian security services. The presence of the unhealthily indoctrinated kids of demonstrates the depravity of the ‘mature’ protestors.

The absence of stringent action by the Indian security forces in the face of a marauding mob will only lead the security personnel to the crematoria. The police officers have to defend themselves because, if pacifism is embraced by them, their lynching will certainly be the tragic ramification.

The central and regional security personnel, as it is, execute a commission that is thankless.

Kashmir is an inseparable ingredient of India, which is a conviction that must be disseminated globally by the concerned departments of the Indian government. One fails to comprehend the sickeningly disproportionate representation bequeathed to the traitorous separatists by segments of the Indian media. The Indian administration, by signalling its preparedness to communicate with the separatists, is culpable for the transmission of a message that legitimizes the perfidious ideology of the separatists. If deliberations are conducted by the government of Bharat with the Kashmiri separatists, it would obviously be interpreted as an acknowledgement by New Delhi that there is some legitimacy in the separatist agenda.

The Indian administration must seriously ponder whether its goal is to legitimize the illegitimate standpoints of the separatists. It is amply evident that the separatists desire secession from India. The Indian authorities must dissect the worthiness of arranging a dialogue with the separatists, the secessionist slogan of which is intolerable and unacceptable.

The Indian governmental solution must obviously be unambiguous and secessionism or de facto secessionism of Kashmir should not even be considered. It must involve a thorough boycott of the separatists and of any entity that declines to adhere to the norms enshrined by the Indian constitution.

What is equally appalling is the failure of the Indian civil society, including fragments of its media, to reflect the aspirations of the Kashmiri Hindus, who represent the indigenous community of Kashmir. The Kashmiri Hindu has not been provided an opportunity to express on the Kashmir imbroglio. The expulsion and massacres of the Kashmiri Hindus by the Crescentic bigots will forever symbolize one of the agonizing injustices perpetrated by India.

Kartikey Sehgal

Read the first part on this page
The respondent is unconcerned about the topic. She is unaware of discussions on casteism and racism in the media. She tells me that there are many like her; they have belief in dharma and don’t bother about what allegations others put on their way of living. Often I have to reconfirm what she says;  “there was lots of bloodshed between the brahmins and kshatriyas” where bloodshed means that the boy’s family didn’t accept the girl. But she loves her home town, Jammu. She continues:

The first food was offered to a cow. It was only then that we ate food. I remember that the  bhangan would come to take away the garbage bag from our home and clear the garbage vans outside our home. No, we would not touch her; we didn’t touch people who indulged in menial labour.

If we touched them by mistake then nothing major would happen. We would wash our hands. We were not punished or anything.

Note that the people indulging in menial labour worked with hands; they picked dead rats, pigs and other waste by digging their hands in heaps of wet garbage. This is not a small town phenomenon and the author found similarity in Mumbai (as reported in this story). The workers stink and people stay away from them.

We are Brahmins and we are not very rich. Many Brahmins are poor; they are supposed to be educated and wise. You also find rich Brahmins who are uneducated.

I note that the other castes are identified as lower castes.

Of course the higher castes have importance. Though there was no untouchability between the castes.

Caste distinction was impossible in schools. There was nobody to keep an eye on who’s touching whom and eating from who is eating from whose Tiffin box. We mingled freely and shared food. The shudra children also attended the same school.

However, we were forbidden to go to our Muslim friends’ home. They came to our home but we had kept a separate set of crockery for them. They too had their rules for us.

The reason is religious conflict and also that they were heavy eaters of non-vegetarian food.

The respondent and I discussed that demarcation of castes is based on profession and nature. She agrees but is unable to point out the reasons for ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ castes.

Inter-caste marriage was a big no-no for quite some time. Brahmin girls had to marry brahmin boys. Since brahmins didn’t give their girls to kshatriyas, they too didn’t give away their girls to brahmin families. That has lessened now. Why did this happen in the first place. I don’t know; we just followed.

Of course, she is not the first person to wonder why we follow something we are not sure of. We are told to follow conventions and we follow them without referring to the scriptures that are supposed to contain the instructions. Is this what is called ‘the slave mentality’?

Today we  meet, accept sweets and hug everybody of respect; anybody who has worked hard and done something of note. Maybe it’s not the same in the villages but then they don’t know what we know. Little education and nobody to tell them about truth and untruth.

I think that last line defines the future of casteism in India.

Kartikey Sehgal

I came upon this information during a conversation on casteism. The lady told me, “There has never been much caste problem in my home town [Jammu] )".

She continued:

“We recently discovered that a family belonging to the shudra caste is actually a brahmin family. The ____ (surname) were brahmins at one time and shifted to a lower caste probably to defend themselves.”

Here’s the backdrop; two families in Jammu have been friends for many decades thought they are from different castes. The shudra family learnt much from the brahmin family owing to the latter’s proficiency in arts and literature. Caste was never a barrier; they shared food and information.

“Then the elder of this family said casually that they were actually brahmins and not shudras. None of us knew about it. He did but he never mentioned this knowledge. But then there’s never been any problems between our families.

It was just a piece of information. So now we know about their gotra and their past and where they are coming from. That’s all.”

There’s no tale of strife between the strictly brahmin family–that must feed the cow before any member eats any food—and the shudra family. I am, of course, attempting to unearth more information about the two families and their relationships. I can’t name them or tell you about them; I am relying on spoken words.

I have read some historians’ account of ‘Many Hinduisms’; no single interpretation of sanatan dharma pervaded India. It is, hence, argued that caste abuse was a limited affair; an assertion markedly different from the popular notion of caste being a common factor throughout India. I find resonance in this story by Professor Meenakshi Jain

“As late as the 18th century, the hierarchical ordering of Hindu society was not an established fact over large parts of the subcontinent. As some eminent historians have pointed out, till that time alternative ideologies and styles of life were strong, indeed dominant, in much of India.”

I shall write more on the topic if assisted with information and permissions.

Kartikey Sehgal

I had predicted problems for Omar Abdullah in my earlier story on Jammu and Kashmir’s (J&K) Chief Minister.
“Omar would be better because others would be worse. And that shall be the bane of being Omar Abdullah.”
[Read that story Here]

The Omar led government is now funding an organisation that aims to spread jihad; and cleanse non-Muslims from the state. Former J&K chief-minister and Omar’s grandfather Sheikh Abdullah had described the organisation as “the real source for spreading communal poison.” More on this later; let me talk about Omar first.

First things First
Omar first sought to placate the Muslims, telling them that the land to be transferred for the benefit of travellers to the Amarnath Yatra was Kashmiri land and “we will fight till we die” to ensure that the land was not given to the Hindus. In effect, he worked towards dividing the state into two parts; he implied that Kashmiri land was not a part of Jammu and Kashmir.

The people who supported him are now after his neck. They want him to be the same old Omar who had once espoused anti-India sentiments and who had successfully bartered nationality for power.
If he doesn’t listen, then they will implicate him in a sex scandal. Basically, they’ll make it tougher for him to be the boss.

Omar had threatened to resign over the scandal. His resignation was refused. He claims he is upset. Or maybe it is drama. In any case, he is not able to govern a state that requires ICU level treatment. So what’s the use, Omar?

Brace Yourself
From the article published in The Hindu.

“Back in 1945, Islamist ideologue Abul Ali Mawdudi called on his followers to “change the old tyrannical system and establish a just new order by the power of the sword.”…
Last week, the National Conference-Congress government quietly moved to help realise Mawdudi’s ugly dream. Hundreds of jobs, a Cabinet decision taken on July 14 mandates, will be handed out to schoolteachers linked to the Jammu Kashmir Jamaat-e-Islami, the party set up in Mawdudi’s name.”

At the end, the writer says,
“Chief Minister Omar Abdullah — whose secular credentials are impeccable — must act to prevent the poisoning of the State’s school education system.”

Perhaps it is right to say, “…whose secular credentials were impeccable”, secularism implying that no harm comes to any community. In addition, as the chief minister, he is responsible for the “poisoning” as the writer calls it. So he can only remove the poisoning; the task defines his role and it is not a favour.

I had also written in the earlier story that,  
“Perhaps, in his private chambers, he will regret his religious tones and vow to never repeat them. Maybe he has sure ideas for economic and social prosperity of the state.”

Where? And,
Now what, Omar?

Kartikey Sehgal

Omar Abdullah could not become the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir through honest means. So Omar Abdullah went to the parliament and stated that he would fight for “every inch of Kashmir’s land” and “we will fight till we die.”

And Omar made the Muslims of the state feel that he is with them in fending off the ‘aggressive Hindus’.

Let us quickly relive that glorious period in Omar’s political career which redefined his status as protector of the Muslims.

It so happened that last year, some politician asked the J&K Governemnt for 39.88 hectares of land to make arrangements for pilgrims to the Amarnath cave. You see, every year we have lakhs of people going to Amarnath and praying to lord Shiva and Parvati among other Gods. The politician asked for the land so that some makeshift arrangements could be made for the pilgrims (both Hindus and Muslims).

Enter the educated and ‘suave’ Omar. Along with other politicians from other political parties, he told the people of Kashmir that valuable land was being snatched from them and made available to the Hindus. Muslims got angry and started protesting against ‘Hindu aggression’. Then some politicians told the Hindus that Muslims were hampering with the Amarnath pilgrimage. So the Hindus started protesting against Muslims.

Of course, Omar never told the people that the proposed land transfer was temporary in nature and required only till the duration of the pilgrimage. Instead, he entered the parliament and declared that he would fight for “every inch of Kashmir’s land” and “we will fight till we die.” Notice the ‘we’ in his speech. It implies ‘Muslims’. Omar told India that Muslims would fight till they died. And whom would they fight? The Hindus, of course.

[Detailed Explanation of the event]

Such a determined human being is the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir. Unfortunately he would also have to lead the Hindus of the state. The same Hindus he had vowed to “… fight till we die.”

The Early Omar

Till he burnt his imagination and integrity in the Amarnath land issue, Omar was considered wise and mature; a rising politician; an enigmatic youngster and etcetra. He attended the well-known Sydenham College in Mumbai. Sydenham is (was) proud of Omar. I have heard teachers and students of the college talk proudly about their former student. Never, never, never did they say that ‘Muslim Omar’ is a product of Sydenham or ‘Omar, who is a Muslim’ studied at Sydenham. And the people who told me about him were Hindus or Christians. I am sure his “we will fight till we die” must have disturbed his teachers and peers.

Omar has got elected. Not by a clear majority but still, he is looked upon as the most acceptable face in the sea of coalition politics.

His divisive politics have helped him become the chief minister of India’s probably most troubled state. He has Muslim support with him. And the Hindus may have voted for him for lack of a better candidate or because Omar’s father is still a popular political personality.

Perhaps, in his private chambers, he will regret his religious tones and vow to never repeat them. Maybe he has sure ideas for economic and social prosperity of the state. Vowing to kill a community that is considered very tolerant was perhaps just his plan to get ahead and later improve the political system.

Conclusion

The abysmal education level of the people from Jammu and Kashmir has also helped Omar’s ambition. People in the valley are guided by religious passions. These passions submerge the pain of living without enough food and security. Of course, religion will take a back seat when bullets pelt the brick houses and when the body is too weak to carry a blanket.

Whatever praise Omar earns from hereon would pale in face of the imagined ideal leader; an ideal Omar would never reach. It would also be in relation to the deficiencies of other politicians. Omar would be better because others would be worse. And that shall be the bane of being Omar Abdullah.

This is your work, Omar

Young children on the streets in Jammu asking the Governement to not go back in it’s decision to provide some land for Amarnath pilgrimage arrangements

Photograph: Jaipal Singh

And this too…

Women from Kashmir protesting against the Governemnt decision to temporarily provide land to the Amarnath pilgrims. They were not told by Omar and other politicians that this was a makeshift arrangement and that nobody was losing anything.

For this result

Photo Source

Kartikey Sehgal

If you have read the articles on Jammu and Kashmir (here and here), then you’d know that the Kashmir land issue was political fabrication. While political parties were wasting time in preparing for elections in the state, and provoking people to kill, a bunch of people were preparing to plant some bombs in Delhi.

The politicians and the bomb planters achieved their aim.

The politicians succeeded in dividing people in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) along religious lines but the bomb planters united many religions on September 13 when the survivors and family of victims cursed terrorism despite any prior religious bias.

Perhaps it can be inferred that had the bombs been planted in empty places, with the blasts not hurting or killing people, the event would have been more meaningful than the wasteful exercise of the government and its rivals in J&K.

The elected representatives of ‘We the People’ spent months over an infertile stretch of land when they could have planned to start thinking about public safety. And therefore, should we not tell the aggrieved families–if they ask us– that the source of their anguish lies in the minds of decorative kurtas and seamless cotton saris?

It can be expected that the thrust of politicians would be towards managing people and soothing their fears instead of generating ideas to prevent future killings.

A solution that has taken centre stage is the formulation of a ‘Federal Agency’ to deal with terrorism or religious killings. If this idea, floated some years back, had force and purpose behind it, then it would have been implemented immediately. It was rejected by the political opposition that is now keen to accept it since it is in power.

This is an apt example of the usage, ‘playing with lives’.

A solution that I propose has assumed a sense of cliché among the non thinking section of the people who are bored or discouraged by promises of social change. Education.

I have mentioned about education in my earlier story on ‘Orrisa Riots‘.

“While you are building nuclear missiles, the country may be bustling with riots.
Make some libraries and schools. Include sex education in every curriculum.”

Open public libraries and stop censorship. Let people indulge themselves in subjects of their choice and do away with the importance given to religious identity. Let children and adults unite under the pretext of thought. If a thought has any potency, then it will not advocate murder or injury. A human thought that is allowed unhindered exploration of the self generates ideas for its betterment.

Understand this.

The number of religious killings may reduce if we allow education to anybody who seeks it. The unlettered masses must be set free from adopting the thoughts of the politicians and they must think for their self.

Illustration: Kartikey Sehgal

Kartikey Sehgal

The Amarnath Yatra organised by the Government of J&K in July and August is currently embroiled in controversy. About 5.5 lakh people made the 141 km trip from Kashmir to the cave this year.

Nobody has a problem with the journey. Residents of Jammu are uneasy with residents of Kashmir over a land transfer issue.

Here’s what is happening:

This is what I know. Hindus in Jammu and Muslims in Kashmir are protesting against the government. And people in Kashmir are asking for independence.

No. Not everyone in Kashmir is asking for freedom. It’s only a faction that supports secession of Kashmir from India.

Then what are people from Jammu and Kashmir fighting over?

A non existent land transfer. Let me introduce the issue at hand.

In 2001, S K Sinha, the Governor of J&K formulated the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board (SASB) for some unfathomable reason and functioned as it’s chairman.

The SASB wanted land from the State government for makeshift arrangements for pilgrims to Amarnath. It was agreed by an order of the High Court that the use of the land would be temporary and limited for the duration of the yatra.

Ok, land can’t move; it was to be used temporarily by SASB to make arrangements for the pilgrims who go to the Amarnath Cave every year. So what happened this year?

The Chief Minister ordered for the diversion of the land to SASB. Read this as a temporary transfer of land only for the duration of the yatra, as approved by the High Court.

What’s the catch?

Nothing so far. Of course, you can question the logic behind SASB and its motives. For instance, couldn’t the government continue providing facilities for the people as it had been doing all these years?

You see, the order delivered by the CM stated that, “the diversion of forest land measuring 39.88 hectares for raising prefabricated structures only for camping purposes of pilgrims without going in for construction of permanent structures”.
The order also stated that, “the propriety status of the land shall remain unchanged” and “returned to the Forest Department when it is no longer wanted by the SASB”.

So SASB people would give the land back after August when the pilgrimage ended and things would be as they always have been.
So the people thought otherwise, they thought…

Not the people. The separatist leaders decided to provoke the people and bully them into believing that valuable Kashmiri land had been lost to Hindus. You must know that Jammu and Kashmir make a single state. So land can not be taken from Kashmir and given to Jammu. So the separatist leaders wanting Kashmir to join Pakistan made the Muslim population believe that the land was being given permanently to the Hindus and that this was a part of a cultural invasion.

The people got provoked, angry, beat their chests, cried and cursed and decided to burn vehicles and raise pro-Pakistan slogans.

So this was a case of miscommunication?

Perhaps not. The separatist leaders most probably knew about the temporal nature of the transfer. They lied to the people about the scene which is not the same as miscommunication.

What about the CM? Didn’t he clarify?

He is no longer the CM. He regrets the turnout of a simple decision. He is from the Congress Party. He is allowing his bosses to talk for him.

Update me about the party thing…

Congress ‘ruled’ J&K along with People’s Democratic Party (PDP). They parted ways recently. There’s army rule in the state right now.
Oh! The President’s Rule. That’s a good thing. So we have somebody from the Central government coming to Jammu and Kashmir to solve the problem. Who is this person?

The new governor N N Vohra

He made everything okay?

He made it worse. He said that the SASB does not require the land and that it could be taken back by the State. The temporary land transfer was revoked. The governor actually made it look like the land was handed over to the Hindus and that he is returning it.

The Hindus felt that their land has been lost and start agitating against the revocation and demand their land back.

So he didn’t tell the people that the land transfer was temporary? And that the spirit was to just accommodate the pilgrimage population?

No. He didn’t.

An unfortunate incident of miscommunication, is it?

Once again, no miscommunication. This was planned.

Hmmm? Ok, come back to this later. What happened next?

The separatist leaders in Kashmir celebrated the revocation of the land transfer order. They didn’t stop at this stage and are now demanding independence. This is a chance of a lifetime for them and they’re invoking names of recognised terrorist outfits to scare the masses.

And the people of Jammu are now protesting for the land?

Absolutely. Religious organisations from other parts of the country have joined them. They are now united against ‘Islamist supremacy’.

And the people following the separatist path in Kashmir are against ‘Hindu supremacy’.

Yes.

Let’s take a breather. Let me recall.

• Congress, the party ‘ruling’ India; and the PDP, together form a government in J&K.

• The Congress CM says yes to a temporary land transfer.

• Separatists make it look like a permanent transfer and therefore a Hindu invasion.

• Protests and riots start in Kashmir.

• PDP and Congress fall apart, CM resigns.

• Congress sends N N Vohra to ease things out.

• He doesn’t shed light on the temporary transfer. Instead, he says that the land is not required.

• Hindus think they have lost the land and start protesting.

• Meanwhile, separatists celebrate and continue their demand for independence.

Now tell me, nobody from the government did anything to solve the issue and tell the truth to the people?

Okay, let’s recall. N N Vohra is sent as the governor and he doesn’t help anyone. Why do you think he didn’t tell people the facts? You see, he needed that extra vote from PDP and National Conference to prevent the no confidence motion against the Congress-led UPA government. Therefore, in all probability, he was sent to appease them and ensure their support at the Centre.

Explain.

The UPA government at New Delhi was facing a crucial no confidence motion and desperately needed the support of PDP and National Conference. So instead of saying that the land transfer issue is a no-issue, Vohra appeased National Conference (NC) and PDP by saying that the land was not required by SASB.

You mean that PDP and NC are supporting the separatists?

When the separatist leaders mobilised the masses against the CM’s order, PDP and NC got scared that they might lose the support of the people. So they stepped on to the streets and started speaking for justice to Kashmir. They wanted to take advantage of people’s anger and tell them that they’ll help them.

They knew that the land transfer was temporary, like only for two months?

Of course they did. They could have told the facts to the people. But you see elections are around the corner. So Omar Abdullah went to the parliament and stated that he would fight for “every inch of Kashmir’s land” and “we will fight till we die.” He wanted sympathy from the Kashmiri and their votes.

So these people have nothing to do with the nation and the people. Aren’t they separatists also?

PDP party’s Mehbooba Mufti too wanted to side with the rioters to get their votes for the next election. That’s why she withdrew from the Congress-PDP coalition.

So PDP and NC want votes from Kashmir for their state government and Congress wants vote from these two parties for their central government. This is murky. This is more complex than the Bermuda Triangle.

I don’t even have to tell you how the people from Jammu and Kashmir are being fooled. Not to mention countless people in India who are easily misled by passions and emotions.

Yes, we meet people who think that Kashmiri’s are being selfish and not giving the land for the Amarnath pilgrimage, and then there are those who think that Jammu citizens are being selfish in taking land from Kashmir when they can do without it.

Nobody is being selfish, except the politicians, of course.

Ananth Venkatesh

The protests in J & K over the issue of the revocation of the command of the state Government to transfer 100 acres of land to the Amarnath Shrine Board has brought to the fore the unpleasant divisiveness hidden underneath the superficially secular fabric of the state.

The decision to bequeath enormous acres of land to the Shrine Board, constituted by the enactment of an Act by the provincial legislature, has been an immensely controversial one, with allegations of varying degrees being leveled by numerous political and extremist outfits operating in the state. The fierce marches in the Kashmir valley against the earlier pro-land transfer order of the State Government was followed by a feeble surrender of the Government to the principal demand of the protestors, which was to rescind the decree.

The subsequent protest rallies in Jammu, organised by the Amarnath Sangharsh Samiti and right-wing parties, against the nullification of the land transfer edict has sorrowfully led to the communalisation of the matter. The accusation, hurled by the fanatically separatist Hurriyat Conference, of the Indian State intending to transform J&K demographically, needs to be treated contemptuously. Such an indictment is worthless. Nevertheless, the violent protest marches in Kashmir and the consequent appeasement of the agitators by mainstream political groups is reflective of the desirousness of Kashmiris for genuine autonomy laden with undertones of nationalism. This is a volatile combination, which the Indian Government needs to vigilantly view. PDP, whose ministers were constituents of the J&K cabinet when the ruling to bestow land to the Board was passed, have to shoulder some portion of the blame for the unstable predicament plaguing their state currently.

The pilgrims to Amarnath need to be provided with enriched amenities. Land, a sensitive issue in the state, needs to be provided for the betterment of the experience of the pilgrims. Temporary allocation of land to the Board during the months of the pilgrimage is a satisfactory solution, as propagated by ex-CM of J&K, Farooq Abdullah, recently. The autonomous temperament of the Shrine Board must be maintained credibly. Bestowal of enhanced services for the pilgrims is a liability of the Central and state Government.

The blockade of Kashmir, implemented by the agitated Jammuites, is a kind of economic Balkanisation, severely affecting the economy of Kashmir. An all-party delegation headed by the Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, and Home Minister, Shivaraj Patil, to settle the disputation is a promising step. Nonetheless, this delegation needs to be entrusted with powerfulness to solve the crisis there, which is marring the state and tearing apart its erstwhile secular culture. This should not be a toothless delegation, which is hampered by disablement.

The ideological separation of the province is indicative of the lugubrious termination of the secularism of the region. Kashmir, famous for its one-time secularism, manifested by the discovery of the Amarnath Cave by a Muslim family more than one hundred years back and the management of the pilgrimage with the assistance of the Kashmiri Muslims, is in an endangered position. The demonstrations in Kashmir were never directed at the pilgrims. A resolution to this contentious issue has to be found, because it threatens to disrupt the functioning of a vital and wobbly Indian region.